September 18, 2013
[font size="6"][b]IF [u][a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9ca26296-0294-418f-a91b-6cebf47f2135"]robo-signing VOIDS a foreclosure[/a][/u]…[/b][/font][font size="4"]then what does a NO-BO signing entail??[/font]
[div align="center"][img src="http://ifap.ed.gov/images/library/fsa_v3_color1.jpg" alt=" "][/div]
[font size="4"]Despite [b][i]ruling[/i][/b] that [u][b][a href="http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A1Sec10.html"]Article 1 Section 10 of the Constitution[/a][/b][/u] is irrelevant in student loan garnishment hearings,[/font] the DOE’s loan-sharking enforcers, a.k.a. Federal Student Aid [FSA] thugs, [font size="5"][b]forgot to sign their [i]ruling[/i][/b][/font]
Now i’m sure the Texas Illuminati over at FSA were laughing their asses off as i sent tweets to NY Attorney General Schneiderman and the putz in D.C. who’s supposed to be THE AG…so maybe they’re not aware of Preet Bharara–the man behind bankster justice in the Southern District of New York??
Twitter just hipped me to [b][u][a href="https://twitter.com/FinancialEvoGrp"]Chritopher T. Lawson[/a][/u][/b], a fellow fighter against the damn near Mafia-like culture of [b][i]usury[/i][/b] that goes hand-in-hand with taking out a student loan…and despite the NO-BO signings on their shakedown notices, [font size="5"]is it even [i][b]legal[/b][/i] to garnish wages before a decision is made by the NSA??[/font]